Contents
Search
W.E.B. Du Bois Library Cataloging Manual

WHEN TO TREAT AN ITEM AS A DUPLICATE/ADDED COPY
 
 
 
 

    CONTENTS

    1. General Information
    2. Specific Guidelines
    3. Additional Information for Paperbacks
    4. Other Considerations

 
1. General Information
Use these guidelines to make local decisions on treating new materials as added copies/duplicates or as separately cataloged, different editions in cases where the same title is already in the Library's collection. This process involves comparison of the bibliographic information from the work itself with that shown in our local cataloging record. Decisions on whether or not to use a given OCLC record are governed by detailed guidelines in OCLC's Bibliographic Formats and Standards and a local document "Cataloging Later Editions or Printings of a Previously Published Book."  
Not every case can be covered by the guidelines in this document. Problems and questions not resolved by the information presented here should be brought to the attention of a supervisor.
Return to top of page
2. Specific Guidelines
An item should be treated as an added copy/duplicate to an existing title if the bibliographic description of the first one cataloged fits the new item acquired in all major aspects. Listed below are the areas which should be examined when making the added copy/different edition decision. One or more important variations in these areas normally indicates that a separate record should be created for the new item.

A. Author of the work
B. Title
C. Edition statement
D. Place of publication and publisher
E. Distributor
F. Date
G. Format
H. Physical description
I. Accompanying material
J. Series statement
K. Language of the text
L. Name of editor, translator, illustrator
M. Contents note
N. Other notes
 
 

A. Author of the work. Do not treat as a different edition on the basis of different choice or form of entry in the record.
 

Return to list of Specific Guidelines

B. Title. Do not treat as a different edition because of differences in judgment as to what constitutes title vs. subtitle information or differences resulting from use of cover title information vs. title page information. However, a difference in actual wording of title or subtitle may indicate that material has been revised.
 

C. Edition statement, if any (can appear in description or in a note). Some publishers, notably Latin American, Spanish, Portuguese, and German ones, often use the word "edition" (e.g., "edicion," etc.) to mean printing. A true new edition may often be distinguished, in such cases, by the use of additional terms such as "revised," "enlarged," "corrected," etc. Note that, in some cases, we own several editions of the same title, in addition to the one that may be indicated on the routing slip. When edition statements differ, check to see if any more appropriate catalog record is in the shelflist or Innopac.
 

D. Place of publication and publisher. Treat as the same edition if the publisher is the same, and if any one place named on the item matches one given in the description. In the case of multiple publishers, treat as the same edition if any publisher named in the item matches one given in the cataloging description. If the publisher is different (not just form or completeness of the publisher name, or name of parent company vs. name of its subsidiary), treat as a different edition.

Note: In some cases, the book in hand names more than one place of publication and/or publisher, but no corresponding place/publisher appears in the catalog record. In other cases, the book names only one place/publisher and the catalog record a different place/publisher, but the book matches the rest of the catalog record. In both cases, the book already in the stacks should be checked to see if places/publishers not shown in the catalog record are listed in the book, keeping in mind the "one in the item matches one in the catalog description" criterion for treating the newly acquired book as an added copy.  Edit publishing information if necessary.
 

Return to list of Specific Guidelines

E. Distributor. Do not treat as a different edition on the basis of presence or absence of distributor information or difference in name of distributor.
 

F. Date. Do not treat as a different edition on the basis of differences in printing date or manufacture date in the case of photocopies added to photocopies, unless the particular printing contains textual variations as indicated by phrases such as "Reprinted 1982 with corrections," or "2nd revised printing," or you have a reprint by a different publisher. Do not treat copyright renewal as a different date unless accompanied by other changes in the work.
 

G. Format. Treat as the same edition only if the format of the item in hand is the same as the item described by the existing catalog record, e.g., add microfilm items only to microfilm records; do not add photocopies to records for the original or vice versa. See part 3, below, for special instructions for paperback editions.
 

Return to list of Specific Guidelines

H. Physical description. Do not treat as a different edition on the basis of minor variations in physical description such as presence or absence of illustration statement. Do watch for presence or absence of special illustration statements, such as "Extra illustrated edition," differences between multi-volume vs. single-volume editions, etc. Check the last page or so of the work in hand; sometimes an "afterword" or addendum or supplement of just a page or two has been added to the original, creating a true new edition. Size differences between paperback and hardcover editions should be disregarded.
 

I. Accompanying material. Watch for differences in accompanying material, but do not treat as a different edition on the basis of presence or absence of accompanying material statement in the record.
 

J. Series statement. Do not treat as a different edition solely on the basis of form of the series statement or presence or absence of a series statement in the record or on the piece. To be treated as a different edition, there must be a totally different series associated with the piece.
 

Return to list of Specific Guidelines

K. Language of the text. Treat translations, simultaneous publications in different languages, etc., as different editions.
 

L. Name of editor, translator, illustrator. Treat as a different edition if item has a different editor, translator, or illustrator; if information present on the item is lacking in the record, compare the item in hand with the previously cataloged item.
 

M. Contents note. Do not treat as a different edition on the basis of presence or absence of a contents note in the record, but watch for major variations in content of the volume(s).
 

Return to list of Specific Guidelines

N. Other notes. Watch for notes in the existing record or information in the newly-acquired volume indicating differences in content, which normally require treatment as a different edition. Indications of limited, numbered, or autographed editions/copies, whether in the volume or in the existing record, do not in themselves justify cataloging as a new edition.
 

Return to top of page
 

3. Additional information for paperbacks
A common problem in deciding whether or not to treat an item as an added copy to a title already in the collection involves paperback editions of works the Library owns in hardback edition, or vice versa. Apply the following guidelines in dealing with the special case of paperback editions:
  A. Treat the paperback edition as an added copy if the only differences from the hardcover edition are one or more of the following:
  1. Size

2. Presence of a paperback publisher's series

3. Presence of a statement such as "first paperback edition"

4. Renewed copyright; no new material added to the work

5. ISBN (hardcover vs. paperback ISBN).
 
B. Treat the paperback edition as a different edition if the differences include:  
1. Significant differences in pagination
2. Significant differences in edition statement (not just "paperback edition" or "first paperback edition")
3. Significant differences in series statement (i.e., a totally different series)
4. New copyright, when edition includes new material (such as a new introduction, a supplement, or a postscript).
Return to top of page
4. Other considerations A. When adding a copy to our collection under the current policy, staff will encounter situations where they will be adding copies to existing catalog records created under earlier policies, when printings may have been treated as separate editions. Sometimes, the item added may even be an earlier printing than the one already in the collection. Generally, add the new copy to a record for the same "edition" (i.e., printing) if we have such a record. If there is no matching "edition," add the copy to the earliest "edition" we have, and delete the edition statement from the Innopac record.
 

B. When adding copies under the circumstances outlined above, there may be a date in the call number of the existing record which is totally inappropriate for the volume being added (especially when adding an earlier printing to a later one). Do not change or delete the date in the call number; simply continue to use the call number created for the printing we already have.
 
 

Specific Guidelines

Paperback
 
 

Top of page

Cataloging Manual Contents Page

Cataloging Manual Search
 

6/2/95 - D4 / HTML 10/17/00; rev. 5/31/01


Copyright 2000 University of Massachusetts, Amherst
For corrections, comments and suggestions contact the Cataloging Manual Committee, W.E.B. DuBois Library
This is an official page of the University of Massachusetts Amherst Campus