Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
rda_vs._aacr2_basic_differences [2020/07/23 19:46]
annk removed
— (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
-**RDA vs. AACR2 Basic Differences** 
- 
-Some general differences to be aware of include: 
- 
-  * RDA records will have always an 040 $e rda 
- 
-  * Capitalization of the title may differ in RDA records – will usually (but not always) match the capitalization on the piece.  ​ 
- 
-  * There won’t be a GMD like $h [videorecording] in RDA records. 
- 
-  * RDA records will have edition spelled out in full – so instead of 3rd rev. ed. it will be  Third revised edition. 
- 
-  * RDA records won't have Latin abbreviations ​ //For example:// 
- 
-In AACR2 260 $a [S.l. : $b s.n.], $c 2009. 
- 
-In RDA: 260 $a [Place of publication not identified] : $b [publisher not identified],​ $c 2009. 
- 
-  * RDA records may also have a 264 field for Production, Publication,​ Distribution,​ Manufacture,​ and Copyright Notice 
- 
-  * RDA: Will not have abbreviations for the most part ca. becomes approximately;​ ill. becomes illustrations;​ col. will be color, etc.  Exceptions: cm for centimeter and min. for minutes – these abbreviations are still used in RDA 
- 
-  * There will be 3 new MARC fields in RDA: 
- 
-RDA: 336, 337, & 338: Content, media, and carrier type 
- 
-Content type -- MARC 336 field 
- 
-Media type -- MARC 337 field 
- 
-Carrier type -- MARC 338 field 
- 
-//Book example:// 
- 
-336 $a text $2 rdacontent 
- 
-337 $a unmediated $2 rdamedia 
- 
-338 $a volume $2 rdacarrier 
- 
-//DVD example:// 
- 
-336 $a two-dimensional moving image $2 rdacontent 
- 
-337 $a video $2 rdamedia 
- 
-338 $a videodisc $2 rdacarrier 
  
[unknown link type]Back to top
www.chimeric.de Creative Commons License Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki do yourself a favour and use a real browser - get firefox!! Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0