Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
rda_vs._aacr2_basic_differences [2013/03/14 17:38]
mbanach
rda_vs._aacr2_basic_differences [2020/07/23 19:46]
annk removed
Line 11: Line 11:
   * RDA records will have edition spelled out in full – so instead of 3rd rev. ed. it will be  Third revised edition.   * RDA records will have edition spelled out in full – so instead of 3rd rev. ed. it will be  Third revised edition.
  
-  * RDA records won't have Latin abbreviations +  * RDA records won't have Latin abbreviations  ​//For example://
-  *  +
-For example:+
  
-In AACR2 260 ## $a [S.l. : $b s.n.], $c 2009.+In AACR2 260 $a [S.l. : $b s.n.], $c 2009.
  
-In RDA: 260 ## $a [Place of publication not identified] : $b [publisher not identified],​ $c 2009.+In RDA: 260 $a [Place of publication not identified] : $b [publisher not identified],​ $c 2009.
  
   * RDA records may also have a 264 field for Production, Publication,​ Distribution,​ Manufacture,​ and Copyright Notice   * RDA records may also have a 264 field for Production, Publication,​ Distribution,​ Manufacture,​ and Copyright Notice
Line 33: Line 31:
 Carrier type -- MARC 338 field Carrier type -- MARC 338 field
  
-Book ex:+//Book example://
  
 336 $a text $2 rdacontent 336 $a text $2 rdacontent
Line 40: Line 38:
  
 338 $a volume $2 rdacarrier 338 $a volume $2 rdacarrier
 +
 +//DVD example://
 +
 +336 $a two-dimensional moving image $2 rdacontent
 +
 +337 $a video $2 rdamedia
 +
 +338 $a videodisc $2 rdacarrier
 +
[unknown link type]Back to top
www.chimeric.de Creative Commons License Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki do yourself a favour and use a real browser - get firefox!! Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0