Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
rda_vs._aacr2_basic_differences [2013/03/14 17:39]
mbanach
rda_vs._aacr2_basic_differences [2013/03/14 17:41]
mbanach
Line 13: Line 13:
   * RDA records won't have Latin abbreviations   * RDA records won't have Latin abbreviations
  
-For example:+//For example://
  
-In AACR2 260 ## $a [S.l. : $b s.n.], $c 2009.+In AACR2 260 $a [S.l. : $b s.n.], $c 2009.
  
-In RDA: 260 ## $a [Place of publication not identified] : $b [publisher not identified],​ $c 2009.+In RDA: 260 $a [Place of publication not identified] : $b [publisher not identified],​ $c 2009.
  
   * RDA records may also have a 264 field for Production, Publication,​ Distribution,​ Manufacture,​ and Copyright Notice   * RDA records may also have a 264 field for Production, Publication,​ Distribution,​ Manufacture,​ and Copyright Notice
Line 33: Line 33:
 Carrier type -- MARC 338 field Carrier type -- MARC 338 field
  
-Book ex:+//Book example://
  
 336 $a text $2 rdacontent 336 $a text $2 rdacontent
Line 40: Line 40:
  
 338 $a volume $2 rdacarrier 338 $a volume $2 rdacarrier
 +
 +//DVD example://
 +
 +336 $a two-dimensional moving image $2 rdacontent
 +
 +337 $a video $2 rdamedia
 +
 +338 $a videodisc $2 rdacarrier
 +
[unknown link type]Back to top
www.chimeric.de Creative Commons License Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki do yourself a favour and use a real browser - get firefox!! Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0